Ryan Amos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The default CentOS kernel has worked fine for me. > Just an FYI; CentOS uses the RedHat EL kernel source to > build... It's pretty heavily patched so if you want to use > the latest stable, download the SRPMs from RedHat/CentOS > and patch in the kernel.org patches.
It would be easier to patch in those patches already merged in the Rawhide (Fedora Development) kernels. Especially if you rebuild from SRPM proper. Just a clarification, I'm not advocating using the Rawhide kernels. If there is one place where Fedora Development/Core/Legacy differ heavily with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, it's at the kernel. But the patches from Rawhide kernels would probably be a far better fit for the RHEL kernels. > But yeah, stick with the CentOS kernel unless you have > problems. Agreed. Way too much is added/removed/changed. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
