OK, yet another thread is closing, where I am the only poster :). For the
record, I find out that starting asterisk with -p option (realtime) gives
the following table, which now makes more sense. But what is surprising for
me is that the load of the server was close to 0 in my original post, thus I
would expect similar results. So I'll assume that the previous translation
table (without -p) does not show the real capabilities of this server.
Lesson learned: start asterisk with -p for close-to-actual translation
values.
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - - -
gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 3 - - 13
ulaw - 3 - 1 2 2 1 3 - - 13
alaw - 3 1 - 2 2 1 3 - - 13
g726 - 3 2 2 - 2 1 3 - - 13
adpcm - 3 2 2 2 - 1 3 - - 13
slin - 2 1 1 1 1 - 2 - - 12
lpc10 - 4 3 3 3 3 2 - - - 14
g729 - - - - - - - - - - -
speex - - - - - - - - - - -
ilbc - 4 3 3 3 3 2 4 - - -
Cheers,
Soner
----- Original Message -----
From: "Soner Tari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:34 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] slow translations for ilbc and lpc10 on x86_64
Hi All,
When I do 'show translation' on a Linux asterisk 2.6.9-11.EL #1 Wed Jun 8
16:40:06 CDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and
Asterisk CVS HEAD built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a x86_64 running Linux on
2005-10-19 19:07:08 UTC
I have very strange lpc10 and ilbc rows (sorry the columns are mixed up, I
don't want to use html):
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - - -
gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 3 - - 14
ulaw - 3 - 1 2 2 1 3 - - 14
alaw - 3 1 - 2 2 1 3 - - 14
g726 - 3 2 2 - 2 1 3 - - 14
adpcm - 3 2 2 2 - 1 3 - - 14
slin - 2 1 1 1 1 - 2 - - 13
lpc10 - 48 47 47 47 47 46 - - - 59
g729 - - - - - - - - - - -
speex - - - - - - - - - - -
ilbc - 35 34 34 34 34 33 35 - - -
But, even on a Linux asterisk 2.6.9-11.EL #1 Wed Jun 8 16:59:52 CDT 2005
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
and
Asterisk CVS HEAD built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i686 running Linux on
2005-09-16 19:34:57 UTC
(which is a much slower machine, Athlon 2000+, 32bit anyway)
I have much better result on rows for iLBC and lpc10:
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - - -
gsm - - 2 2 4 2 1 5 - - 25
ulaw - 5 - 1 4 2 1 5 - - 25
alaw - 5 1 - 4 2 1 5 - - 25
g726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 7 - - 27
adpcm - 5 2 2 4 - 1 5 - - 25
slin - 4 1 1 3 1 - 4 - - 24
lpc10 - 8 5 5 7 5 4 - - - 28
g729 - - - - - - - - - - -
speex - - - - - - - - - - -
ilbc - 8 5 5 7 5 4 8 - - -
I've checked asterisk/codecs/ilbc and lpc10 dirs to see any optimizations
for x86_64, but could not find anything.
Should I compile with some different flags? What could be wrong? Or x86_64
is not a supported platform? Any pointers please?
Thanks in advance,
Soner
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
