On Sun, October 9, 2005 15:31, Matt Riddell said: > *PLONK* > > -- > Cheers, > > Matt Riddell >
Is that the sound of you dropping out of this list? It can't be a reply to the previous poster's e-mail, as that was in fact a completely correct statement... But back to the topic: I can see the reasons why Digium does what they do, but I can also appreciate the reasons behind openpbx.org! It's a risk Digium took willingly and knowingly. They must have known from the start that this was a risk, but it is a risk they took, I guess with in the back of their minds the realisation that the risk would most likely be worth it in return for the contributions they'd get to the source-tree... I for one will keep track of both to see which one develops best. For now I am in the (*) camp, but if they lose ground in regard to openpbx.org, I may switch. That is the nice thing about Open Source: you *can* switch, and the best project(s) will survive... Just my 0,02! -- Francesco Peeters ---- GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
