On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:57:19AM +0200, Remco Barende wrote:
After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an
Athlon64) I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately
bristuff without florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours
(console will complain about bad frame received something).
Then merge the fix into the bristuff patch if it has not been merged
yet!
That's what I did when I patched bristuff :)
It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch.
Bristuff -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after
applying the patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies
cleanly).
Latest bristuff is RC8n, BTW. What exactly is the florz patch? It seems
to have been onchanged since January or so.
I have never ever been able to keep a bristuffed box up for more than a
few hours or 2 days at best without the florz patch. It seems that KPJ is
trying various approaches to solve timing problems but I guess it's not
stable yet.
Florz fixes a lot of timing issues, reduces interrupt load and makes
bristuff stable.
You can find more info here:
http://zaphfc.florz.dyndns.org/
Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?
It is part of the debian packages and they are built on amd64 as well.
http://packages.debian.org/zaptel
http://packages.debian.org/libpri
http://packages.debian.org/asterisk
I would guess thet are without bristuff and/or florz?
Bristuff compiles without florz, but zaphfc doesn't after applying florz.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
