|
my $0.02...
I have implemented [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9
in a Real Estate/Legal office with 6 phones and 3 incoming lines using
TDM04B card and Polycom/Sipura phones.
I am about to implement 3 more systems ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3) for a construction company. One will
be 6 phones and 4 PSTN lines using SPA-3000 ATA's. The second will be 2x
TDM04B connecting to 6 lines to start with 10 Polycom IP-501 phones.
The third system has not yet been designed. but will be 4 lines and 6 - 7
phones.
The Real Estate system is running [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9 and has been running for 59 days since the last
reboot, which I did when I added the Polycom phones. This is a fairly
light-use system averaging about 1700 minutes/mo in usage. It is setup to
have an Auto-Attendant when no one is present and to have the phones answered
live when the receptionist is at her desk. I setup a "* + number" code for
the receptionist to dial to toggle the Auto-attendant.
As of yet I have not run into any problems running the one
system in production, and we are confident in the other 3 systems that are about
to be implemented. The systems that will be implemented soon will have
pretty high call volume, as these are for a construction job trailers on pretty
large scale projects.
I started off by exploring Asterisk and actually built a
couple of test systems without using [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I was
able to figure out the configurations and actually had no problems setting up
the test systems (for me it was pretty simple even though I had never
touched linux before). I created a set of config files that I was going to
copy from server to server to aid the implementation, and I was ready to build
the server for the Real Estate office...
Then, I ran across [EMAIL PROTECTED] and after
playing with it a little bit determined that it provided a quicker setup process
and provided all the features that we would need. Clearly, there are some
things that are easier to do without [EMAIL PROTECTED] due to the
limitations provided by AMP... but I have found that for these small office
implementations, this has not been an issue.
Hope this helps.
Jeff Busch
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Felder Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 8:17 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello
What is the difference between these 2 version of Asterisk in
terms of functionality.
For a small office am I going to run into problems if I use the
easy version...
Mike
|
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
