Original advisory should have been posted here at the date of release, or announced by someone, but it wasn't... I guess some people are too busy, can't blame them.
Brian West wrote:
Also it wasn't a proven exploit. They said it "could allow an attacker to obtain remote and unauthenticated access". And if pigs "could" fly I would be a rich man!
bkw
Read the security vulnerability. It referenced CVS as of a certain date. If you aren't keeping up with CVS changes, why are you running CVS at all?
-Tilghman
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
