yes, i agree, we never really felt the need to use unity, *'s vm is functionally ok with callmanager (except for the message waiting indication, or is there?) can *'s vm send a MWI to the callmanager?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Siggi Langauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk user list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:37 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco's CallManager and * (was: Cisco 7960g) (fwd) > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Yifang Dai wrote: > > > I wish! My company just spend a lot $$ on the shinny CCM phone system, so I > > don't think I can change that easily... But if I can get asterisk to > > talk to CCM via h323, and prove it's usefulness, I might have a chance > > to use * in the branches... > > Well, good luck, then! > > > By the way, do you know if we can get *'s VM to communicate with CCM's > > Unity? Thanks for all your help... > > Funny, I'm deploying an * based VM solution here, as people particularly > disliked Unity. > > It's still in it's early stages, but there will be the option of > navigation through voicemail via the Cisco 79[64]0 XML display. > So myadvice (you already guessed) is: drop Unity. Asterisk can do that > better ;-) > > Cheers, > Siggi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
