Thanks James. I'll try this too.. BR, Dan
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Sizemore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 7:52 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now! > Also using the -p (real time option) to start asterisk, may also help. > > > James Taylor wrote: > > >Carlos, > >You may have something here. > >Dan - you might try to connect via the virtual network adapter to your "host" machine's hard drive. (just map a drive) it could be that "networking" from your "VM" to the host is faster. > >James Taylor > > > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > >From: Carlos Eduardo Cremon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > >> Dan, > >> > >>What type of "virtual harddisk" did you create in your linux vmware > >>virtual machine? As far as I know, the default type is a kind of > >>compressed harddisk image, to save disk space in the host machine. > >>Perhaps that is the answer to have bad performance only in local > >>services, opening local files in vmware: the overhead to decompress. > >> > >>-Eduardo > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Dan escreveu: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Nice! > >>>If it can work without connecting it to the power supply, then will be > >>>better..;-) > >>>When we leave the home, I must disconnect from the mains EVERYTHING (the > >>>alarm system and the HA PC are the only accepted exceptions)... > >>> > >>>:-))) > >>> > >>>Dan > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Simon Woodhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:31 PM > >>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hey Dan, > >>>> > >>>>Get a http://www.mini-itx.com/ and disguise it as a fruit bowl. She'll > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>never > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>know! I can't wait until someone builds one looking like a shoe or a > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>handbag > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>and then I can have them all over the house and the more I have, the > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>happier > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>the other half will be!! > >>>> > >>>>W > >>>> > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:12 AM > >>>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Roy, > >>>> > >>>>Please do not give me such a solution. > >>>>I know how and where to buy or how to build a very cheap PC (I work in > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>this > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>field). > >>>>I now that this is a cheaper option (to buy or build a new pc), but I > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>don't > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>want another computer running 24/7 in my house. > >>>>It is so difficult to understand that? > >>>>I have a small flat with two rooms. I want to be able to sleep too in the > >>>>same house. > >>>>My wife for sure will not accept another one... > >>>> > >>>>I feel that it can fully work on my config (allmost it does it now). > >>>> > >>>>It is more challenging to make it work under those circumstances...;-) > >>>>Why to choose everytime the easiest solution available? > >>>>I want to do it for my ..soul...;-) > >>>> > >>>>Best regards, > >>>>Dan > >>>>P.S. I have several PCs available for this, but.. I DON'T WANT TO USE > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>THEM! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:33 PM > >>>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>IIRC you were given URLs for all sorts of cheapo PCs. Perhaps you've got > >>>>>an old P90 lying around? Or perhaps someone else has? > >>>>> > >>>>>Use that! > >>>>>Not vmware! > >>>>>If you're to use vmware, do it the other way around - linux host with > >>>>>vmware windoze guest. This works fine for me on my PC. > >>>>> > >>>>>On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 08:49, Dan wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I have succeed using Asterisk on VMWare on an [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 128 MB > >>>>>>allocated for the Linux virtual machine. > >>>>>>I have connected this PBX with another one using IAX/GSM. I can call > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>the > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>other part and the sound is great, without any interruption. > >>>>>>The phone used is a Cisco7960 with G.711, so still a codec conversion > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>is > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>in > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>place (GSM/G.711) and Asterisk/VMWare Wkst performs very well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>The problem is only when I try to call local services, like echo test > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>or > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>Digium Demo. Then, the sound of the informative message for the Digium > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>Demo > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>is choppy, but the sound from the Digium server (after connection) is > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>very > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>good. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>So.. the problem is only to play local files when in virtual machine > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>(menus, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>informative messages, etc.). Why? It is clear that this is not a > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>computer > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>performance issue and/or a timing problem during the codec conversion. > >>>>>>More, the inband DTMF works like a charm under the virtual machine. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>Even > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>the > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>known problem with double digits for Cisco phones dissapear. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>BR, > >>>>>>Dan > >>>>>>P.S. Please do not answer again that this setup cannot work. In this > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>moment > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>I cannot accept such an answer. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > >> > >> > > > >-- > >James Taylor > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >903-793-1953 > > > >-- > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
