I certainly hope that there is more to their difference. I have not compared both of them recently but I did back during summer 99. Then in my mind I decided that the one that I could get working first would stay. I am still with asterisk. I found that Mark was more than willing to help to help me get going. Bayonne wanted consulting fees that were expensive on my zero budget. Asterisk back in 99 had its problem but it was promissing: 1) inexpensive Zapata cards 2) very effective, simple communication protocol (iax) that would work over firewalls and nat. 3) very straight forward dial plan (extensions.conf) 4) gno-phone was on the works.
Regards, Uriel -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Sizemore Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk VS. Bayonne Asterisk, kind of has support for SIP, Bayonne has none at all. (Last time I checked.) K a z wrote: > > Could someone familiar with both break down the most memorable pro's & > con's and why you have decided to use Asterisk? > > Thanks > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
