Hmm... this gets quickly back to my long-standing desire to have more comprehensive call completion codes being handed back by the channels to the dialplan.
The current method of throwing certain replies into a big bucket called "Busy" and others into a big bucket called "Error" and auto-jumping to certain priorities based on those two results is probably getting towards the end of it's useful life as people get more sophisticated with their dialing plans and error control. Perhaps a method of selectably moving to a "new" method of error handling is in order. Instead of building a million little exception cases, why not hand some values back to the dialplan logic and let the person building the IVR create their own GotoIf tree?
See my post on the topic: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-April/009797.html
JT
There's not really a way to do that that right now, although we could add something like AST_CONTROL_INUSE which could represent that the channel is in use actually. Wouldn't be extremely difficult to do, but would "INUSE" and "BUSY" be the same? If not, where do we jump to?
Mark
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Derek Beaumont wrote:
> ThanksIs it possible to have both a busy and an away message when the call waiting feature is enabled?
extensions.conf ... exten=>403,1,Dial,Zap/3|10 exten=>403,2,Voicemail2,u403 exten=>403,103,Voicemail2,b403 ...
Because I have enabled call waiting, I can't see how it will be possible to get the busy message to play (because there will always be a dial tone). Am I right, or do I have incorrect configurations?
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
