It seems inelegant to rely on my editor or a post-processor to handle things that are easily handled just by trivially changing the way that the parser works.
JT
> In vim, Yuck!
> Then, when I wanted to insert something between 10 and 20, I would > simply call it "15" and it would Just WorkI work on an AS/400 they have a couple of utilities that use this - and after an insertion (when you save) it re-numbers the list. Anyway I would argue against this because most priorities (I expect) are one digit, thus more typing would be required.
In any case, you would probably be better off writing a bash script so a repeated or reduced priority would get (previous+1) to parse the file or a macro for your favorite editor.
exten => s,2,1 exten => s,2,a exten => s,2,b exten => s,3,2 becomes exten => s,2,1 exten => s,3,a exten => s,4,b exten => s,5,2
You might want to look at using macros to simplify maintenance (take a look at the 'hunt' thread also. I expect to finish up soon).
John
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
