----- Enzo Michelangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why "unauthenticated"? This appears to contradict what is said in the > previous sentence, where the restriction is said to apply only to > calls > placed providing authentication information. If a call specifies a > user for > which no authentication is required (such as "guest") it can't be used > for > DoS purposes.
You are correct; the wording is incorrect, it should have been 'pending authentication' calls. Sorry for that. -- Kevin P. Fleming Senior Software Engineer Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Security mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-security
