On Sunday August 7 2005 16:56, steve szmidt spake: > On Sunday 07 August 2005 17:38, Joey Kelly wrote: > > Again, PGP is NOT free software. "Free for noncommerical use" is not > > acceptable when it comes to interacting with Asterisk. Asterisk is > > licensed under the GPL, and therefore is incompatible for use with > > software that is licensed in a restrictive fashion, such as PGP. > > Not acceptable for whom? Me and my customers are more than happy to pay for > a encryption solution. (Though free is nice for the short term. Then when > the developer has starved to death...) > > You seem to have a misunderstanding on the GPL. A freestanding product has > no problem talking to GPL s/w. The FOP for example, talking to the manager, > can do so even if it was a commercial product.
Free-standing? Correct. It not be possible to bundle free and non-free software, which was my point. If I misunderstood what you were actually implying, I apologize. -- Joey Kelly < Minister of the Gospel | Linux Consultant > http://joeykelly.net "I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous." --- David Bradley, the IBM employee that invented CTRL-ALT-DEL
pgphC8HefuEUd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Security mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-security
