On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Seán C. McCord wrote:
> I don't think checking channel events is too onerous, considering that 
> IP-based connections would be able to fail, too.
> 
> As far as the ARI API: I don't really care that much, but is there a 
> reason to not simply use the existing channel tech/target syntax (e.g. 
> ExternalMedia/media.host.example.com:6645)?

Cramming options in the future in a dial string makes things rather unfriendly 
(see chan_sip) - this is why I pushed for an explicit API to create such a 
thing. It's also more approachable, and easier to document.

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to