On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Alexander Traud <[email protected]>
wrote:

> > Do we even WANT an idle timer?
>
> I posted my concerns already in <http://gerrit.asterisk.org/6807>: I have
> a device which crashes when it receives such a keepalive. I could live with
> a timer when Asterisk is not the registrar but registered somewhere else.
> But I do not _need_ that either.
>

So you'd be OK with keeping an idle timeout it as long as you can turn it
off at runtime.    At what level of granularity would it need to be?
System, transport, endpoint?



>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>



-- 
George Joseph
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to