George Joseph wrote:
<snip>
5. The idea of higher level concept configuration has been thrown
around as something to make this easier. I personally think this
sort of thing belongs there. A type=trunk, itsp, phone, etc. Lower
level blocks remain the same and additional logic on top can be
added to handle this sort of thing.
Are you thinking like users.conf? I thought you guys wanted that to die
a horrible death. :) Seriously though, are you thinking along the
lines of a new composite pjsip configuration object that creates the
base objects behind the scenes? If so, that'd solve a lot and I could
start working on it right now. I just thought you guys were shying away
from these types of things.
As base objects it's a bad idea. As a single object to rule them all (a
user) it's also a complicated/bad idea. As higher level concepts which
represent things that people are familiar with they're fine.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
