-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3979/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Asterisk Developers.


Bugs: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24223
    
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24223


Repository: Asterisk


Description
-------

Technically, we shouldn't have many (if any) instances where a channel should 
be allowed to not have a call ID for any significant length of time, but the 
main issue here is simply that gibberish is printed here and that's frequently 
a sign of scary horrible things. In this case, the fear was a little overblown 
and simply caused by a character buffer that wasn't initialized.

Right now, the behavior for how local channels should propagate call IDs is 
undefined.  I'm working on defining that behavior right now but addressing that 
in this issue would be scope creep in my opinion.


Diffs
-----

  /branches/12/main/cli.c 422556 

Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3979/diff/


Testing
-------

Tested the CLI command both with channels that have and don't have call IDs. 
Without a call ID, the call ID field now appropriately appears as (none)


Thanks,

Jonathan Rose

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to