On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Brad Watkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:29 -0600, Mark Michelson wrote: > >> What do you folks think? Should the code in the referenced review be the >> proper way to handle things or is the idea proposed in this message a >> better idea? >> >> Mark Michelson >> > > I absolutely think the idea proposed here is better. My opinion is that > indeed any configuration with unsolicited MWI configured should reject > subsription attempts. >
I think your framing of the situation in this e-mail is correct. It feels like we're trying to infer the intent of the configuration, when in reality, the configuration is probably in error. I like your proposed solution better as well: tell the user that these options are mutually exclusive and have them correct it. -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
