> On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:14 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> > I don't think changing this default is a good idea.  Enabling it is only 
> > useful if you are using the relative channel format.  I have yet to see 
> > anyone on the Asterisk users list actually use this format.
> 
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>     ignore_failed_channels was indeed added to support relative channel 
> format. That is: [/dev/dahdi/]<span-name>/<relative-channnel-number>. We 
> originally thought that this was the only way to guarantee stable channel 
> numbers.
>     
>     However with recent versions of DAHDI we can provide stable channel 
> numbers through other means (/etc/dahdi/span_assignments.conf ). If those are 
> used, DAHDI will assign the requested span and channel numbers for your dahdi 
> devices independenly of any module load order and device discovery. 
> Furthermore, If you only have a single DAHDI device this is a non-issue 
> anyway.
>     
>     One by-product of this work on hotplug dahdi is that we noticed that we 
> can do away with the DAHDI init script (this still depends on a non-default 
> setting in the DAHDI kernel module, but I hope it will change in the future). 
> And thus Asterisk may start before some or all of the DAHDI devices have been 
> configured. When a device is configured, the hook script responsible for that 
> eventually runs 'asterisk -rx "dahdi create channels <first> <last>"'.
>     
>     I'm backporting support for this to wherever I can as it solves some real 
> issues I have. Manually configuring chan_dahdi.conf will work, but I prefer 
> to have sane defaults.
> 
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>     Should it be included in Asterisk 12 as well?

It should be OK for Asterisk 12 since it has not been released yet and it is a 
simple default change.


- rmudgett


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3063/#review10359
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 10, 2013, 4:25 p.m., Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3063/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2013, 4:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If ignore_failed_channels is set to "true" for a channel, the channel will 
> continue to be configured even if configuring it has failed.
> 
> One important this This allows Asterisk to start before all the DAHDI 
> initialization is done and thus not force the starting order dahdi -> 
> asterisk.
> 
> This patch changes the default of the feature from disabled to enabled.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/configs/chan_dahdi.conf.sample 403615 
>   /trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c 403615 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3063/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tzafrir Cohen
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to