Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> ok it doesn't harm but i just don't understand when this .eoo rule
> gets used - I see that C++ modules end up into .oo objects...
> 
> Also everywhere else in the Makefiles .eo and .eoo are handled in the same 
> exact way
> so why bother to differentiate them ?

Sorry, I was unclear. I was agreeing with your proposed simplification;
there is no reason for .oo and .o files to be handled differently when
being embedded.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM)

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to