On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:11:54AM -0700, John Todd wrote: > At 7:37 AM -0500 2007/7/18, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > >On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >> I would like to merge into trunk at least (and later, possibly > >> also into 1.4 if considered useful) some changes aimed at better > >> operation when asterisk is behind a NAT. > > > ><snip> > > > >> The functional changes should be completely backward compatible > >> (except possibly for bugs, but i am not aware of any). > >> However, since i don't know whether some incompatibilities could > >> come out, I prefer to do the work in trunk and merge into 1.4 only > >> when it is complete and we know that there are no surprises. > >> > >> Let me know if you have objections. > > >Given that these are all optimizations, they should go into trunk only > >and not into 1.4 at all (unless one of them fixes a definite bug in 1.4). > > > >-- > >Tilghman > > > > I agree with Tilghman. These changes seem to be a good idea, but
I should have made it clear that my request was only for trunk. The notes about 1.4 were only a comment on backward compatibility and backporting issues, and i have no intentions in that direction. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
