On 17:07, Tue 04 Apr 06, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > In an ideal world, yes. But RDBMSes have slightly different ways of wanting > things worded, some may run faster if you order them in a particular way and > so on... It's good to code as flexibly as possible but sometimes you need to > "go around" the driver or the SQL95 conformance to get something done > "better."
My idea. We have some apps that work with MySQL, Postgres and MS-SQL. We gave up the ODBC stuff and coded our own database lib that uses the native 'drivers'. I'm no fan of ODBC, it limits you too much. (imho) -- Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michiel.vanbaak.info GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D "Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?" _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
