On 03/04/2006 at 12:01 North Antara wrote: >> As a use of his channel driver I've been more than happy with it, and I'm >> more than happy for >> him to maintain it - especially as he seems to understand and apprecaite >> the importance of >> backward compatability as a priority, not an annoyance... >> >> >> Andy / ScaredyCat >> > >When you have code in svn - you don't need backwards compatibility. If >you want an old version, that's fine, you can check out a specific >revision of the entire tree. There is a point where that becomes a >non-issue. Of course, that isn't the issue at hand here.
I'm sorry but that is just wrong in so many ways. . version control and backward compatability are DIFFERENT things. Andy / ScaredyCat _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
