On Monday, March 6, 2006, 16:51:31, Steve Kann wrote: > ... > I don't know if the spec should include this as a requirement or not: > It was really a workaround for a broken implementation
IMHO a broken implementation is equivalent to a different protocol. A spec should describe how to do it right, not enumerate several ways to do it wrong. At least not in a normative section, a non-normative appendix would be the appropriate way to incorporate it in the spec if its really needed. > -- but it would still be needed for asterisk < 1.2, or very old > iaxclient implementations (the new jitterbuffer was in iaxclient > before asterisk). I'm not familiar enough with IAX history. Were the older implementations IAX Version 2? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
