Tim Panton wrote:
...
(amended)
Yes. Quite right, there is a problem here, The way we've implemented
this
is that iseq is set to the highest value+1 of all contiguously
received
frames.
So if we see a frame sequence
1,2,4,5 then iseq sticks at 3
but if we get 1,2,3,4,5 then it is 4
-SteveK
You're right, Dimitri. I'm guessing he meant to type the sequence
1,2,4,5,3 which would be illustrative of what happens when you receive
out-of-order full frames.
surely 1,2,4,5,3 would stick at 3, according to the def'n above ?
but if 1,2,3,5,4 then it is 4
If that is so,then how do frames 4 & 5 ever get acked ?
Adrian
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
