In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Cadach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Q.SIG is based on Q.931, so basic Q.SIG support is already available. Support > for advanced Q.SIG features (including other Q.931-based signallings) like > supplementary services could be developed on per-request basis, just because > no > real Q.SIG hardware is available for testing. > > Anyway be ready to have some sort of inadequate reactions of PBX or Asterisk > with Q.SIG signalling, report the bugs, provide any requested > traces/information > and such misoperations will be fixed ASAP.
Thanks Paul and Matt for your quick responses! The application is just for a simple conference bridge to sit behind the PBX for people to dial into. So I expect the advanced Q.SIG features will not be required. I hope not, anyway. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
