Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 27 May 2005 05:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
Using zaptel just for a time source is silly. We should use POSIX
timers instead. Here's a start, but I don't know how long it'll be
before I can get to finish it, so I thought I'd post it here in the
hope that someone else will pick it up.


As noted here:

http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2002-April/002072.html

software timers are lacking.

Call me slow, or just a user, but I don't understand your response. I can't tell if you're agreeing with David's post, or not.

I read the link, it's to a brainstorm about using USB as a timing source.

Is that the "software timer" that's lacking, or is it the POSIX implementation you're referring to?

/me says "huh?"

--
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
begin:vcard
fn:Andrew Thompson
n:Thompson;Andrew
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://aktzero.com/
version:2.1
end:vcard

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to