On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:27:44AM -0500, Steven wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 -0400, Travis wrote: > > I do commend you for being selective of which packages to install, but > > I was referring to availability to install python. On all > > distributions that I am aware of (which would encompass the ones the > > vast majority that people would be installing on), python is readily > > available. There is no hindrance. > > While I think those who install asterisk on the linksys routers are a > little odd, but I'm pretty sure that python isn't available there. Of > course I'm pretty sure they aren't compiling on the linksys so it isn't > as big of an issue.
This would be a build-time requirement (just like bison, or make), not a runtime requirement. (Not that I think that replacing make with scons is that grand an idea, though) So, which will be faster to write autoconf patch or scons patch? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
