Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Sine PCstatus had so many more options than other Status: headers
I would prefer creating a new one. I think having one header with tons of different usages and options for different events is confusing.
I think I'd disagree; that header is not going to be parsed independently of the event name it is attached to; the 'context' would tell you what value are expected/allowed there.
If each event is going to have its own 'status' header, with different values, then I don't see much difference between that and using different events with no 'status' header at all.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
