Steven Critchfield wrote:
For my office we have used subversion. We have been pretty happy with it
as well. But the reason I suggested we look at arch is that it would be
really nice to help merge in some of the foreign patch sets into an
easier to get and maintain branch.
Exactly... one of my goals (I'll post more details in the other thread) is to allow members of the 'team' to have a public area on a development server to make their patches available for testing/comments/etc, in a form that people can easily download and automatically update (without requiring monitoring a Mantis bug and downloading/applying new patches). While everyone can do this now by setting up their own CVS/SVN/etc. public server, that's a lot to ask (and manage) for someone who just wants to help out with development and bug fixing.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
