On Monday 11 April 2005 23:40, Brian Capouch wrote: > Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > On Monday 11 April 2005 22:52, Brian Capouch wrote: > >>There's an article about it on Google today. Quite a bit has > >> been written about it in various places. One such is at the > >> link below. Looks to be a nice kettle of fish, involving a lot > >> of hard feelings all around: > > > > I fail to see how this is on-topic for the Asterisk Developers > > ML. Take your discussion to Slashdot. > > Ha ha ha. > > Have you listened to any of the devlopers' conference calls where > that very topic has been central, and discussed for very > significant periods of time?
That's a conference call; this is a mailing list. We have a very specific charter, which is discussion of modifications to the Asterisk source code. > Otherwise, ask yourself who appointed you the list-meister. Delete > it if it doesn't interest you; otherwise get off your high horse. You sound like a spammer: "Delete it if it doesn't interest you." No, we don't need it on this list to begin with. This is the reason many developers are not on the -users list: because there's a ton of off-topic crap. There are plenty of other fora for discussing this; we don't need it here. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
