Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
all contributors conform to your 'code quality' standards is silly: Having
"not documented" code is better than having no code at all (see: app_realtime).


That's quite debatable.


Yeppers. I've talked to a fair number of people, two of them core developers, asking whether they use realtime in production, and if so, what they think of it.


So far I haven't found the first person who is using it--I hope these posts might rectify that--but in every case my followup question was, "Why not," and I heard the exact same thing: paucity of documentation, opacity of the code.

Also, if one complains 'I can't understand your code therefore it must be
your problem, and you must help me understand' - again, expect to be
flamed for that.


That'd be on a case by case basis. For some of the code, that's a perfectly
fine statement.


Well several nice people have volunteered to help me master it off-list, which means that others who are potentially interested are on their own.


Which, if I read Alex correctly, is more than just fine by the developers whose sentiments he represents.

B.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to