-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher >> >Currently, we have a 2 integer method, which is guaranteed to be >> >machine-unique: unixtime and instance increment, which, as long >> > as the daemon isn't constantly restarting, is fine. To add >> > network uniqueness, the addition of a third integer should be >> > sufficient: the 32-bit integer representation of the IP address. >> > Oddly, that's 96 bits, 32 less than MD5, yet it's guaranteed to >> > be unique for at least the next 30 years. >> >> What's wrong with using a GUID? > >Formulated how? I just explained how you could formulate one, which >should be sufficient for an enterprising soul to code (even if that >enterprising soul is me).
Why not use uuid_generate? -Michael _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
