Hi Guys,
can someone tell me why DUNDi does not use the same principals as BGP4, where
on session start *all* routes are transmitted from one peer to another, and later only
transmit the changes? If i understand the whitepaper correctly, any lookup in the
network will be sent to *any* peer. So this is basically the same as Gnutella.
Gnutella worked fine in the beginning, but now you can fill allmost any available bandwith
without downloading/uploading any file. With 10 gnutella peers i can easily saturate
my 2Mbit link in both directions.
Won't we have the same problem as gnutella in a few years? I'm sure DUNDi works fine
at the moment, but imagine a few years in the future, when it's a IETF- (or even ITU-)
standard with a few thousands of peers...
Memory to store all routes shouldn't be a problem, one BGP4 full feed takes only 50MB,
and thats about 130'000 routes...
Any comments?
Regards, Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
