I can't figure out why this email was cought by dkim test. It does not have dkim signature so why assp thinks its absolutely supposed to have one? (X-Assp-Message-Score: 100 (DKIM none)) ? Neither domain in envelope from nor From header has dmarc policy other than none (gmail has none). Mail analiser does not provide any info about dkim.
>From [email protected] Mon Jul 11 20:36:09 2016 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=45991 helo=smtp.aa.eu) by smtp.aa.eu with smtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1bMg3t-0003Nv-AY for [email protected]; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:36:09 +0200 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44] helo=mail-wm0-f44.google.com) by smtp.aa.eu with SMTPS(TLSv1_2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) (2.4.4); 11 Jul 2016 20:36:01 +0200 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f126so101352015wma.1 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:36:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=ijmjd431SFINGuMPGLKFTshtJ7BgqcIzbPeB48sreBU=; b=ggOyW6d646aWsCOf0RJORx3+H18mgndPYfpczCjq0W502dslXAv/zgdI5VoUaVkJTl tl3duVo2gRxtwoCZMfHuDvyYgxR4g6Ll7PXVPKDpgOPfdAFlGeaVffxvbDEMGWeJCUvL biOXon0GrqzsfEYGx2iPN7YyFpnAsoi8CSfLvx21X8VHcrEP4wIpza0ntQi1osOcXI75 T41w6F9dnYyTMw+utcfnArkEL2sjJ/kRxuU3z9aDYvp1NYQrKT0JOhCfWsjxJdirptFm 0AnuoZ1xWLpZPEOxZzqTPy5ZfQsT6G2RgifCbh2aC8rFbwkQMXONRubsy08owX3fKDsF d/7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI6p8WgE+beNJigUlC64XXbpEK+VXiJdvuaKfYlen+8q2sblC2M5vTgTSxHltFiCw== X-Received: by 10.28.128.207 with SMTP id b198mr16677425wmd.56.1468262161077; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Dellicjusz ([13.15.176.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qp8sm1103199wjc.46.2016.07.11.11.35.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "aa aa, Grupa aa.pl" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: +SPAM+ =?iso-8859-2?Q?=22Biblia_e-biznesu_2=22_ju=BF_po_sk=B3adzie_-_pro=B6b?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?a_o_przejrzenie_i_ostatnie_ewentualne_mikro-poprawki?= Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:36:02 +0200 Message-ID: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0109_01D1DBB3.D9B4D1B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdHbn4SDC+u7nsO+TESMWLCC7o+0LA== Content-Language: pl X-Assp-ID: smtp.aa.eu 62163-328823 X-Assp-Session: 7F9638EFEB58 (mail 1) X-Assp-Detected-RIP: 13.15.176.19 X-Assp-Source-IP: 13.15.176.19 X-Assp-Version: 2.4.4(15106) on smtp.aa.eu X-Assp-Client-TLS: yes X-Assp-Delay: not delayed (74.125.82.44 in noDelay ); 11 Jul 2016 20:36:03 +0200 X-Assp-Message-Score: -10 (74.125.82.0 in griplist (0.09)) X-Assp-Message-Score: -5 (SPF pass) X-Assp-IP-Score: -5 (SPF pass) X-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp.aa.eu; spf=pass dkim=none X-Assp-Message-Score: 100 (DKIM none) X-Assp-IP-Score: 100 (DKIM none) X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit X-Assp-allLoveBaysSpam: 1 X-Assp-allLoveMXASpam: 1 X-Assp-allLovePTRSpam: 1 X-Assp-allLoveRBLSpam: 1 X-Assp-allLoveSPFSpam: 1 X-Assp-allLoveSpam: 1 X-Assp-Spam: YES X-Spam-Status:yes X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 85, limit 50 X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 85 X-Assp-Intended-For: [email protected] X-Assp-Copy-Spam: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
