LOCTR is a *lot* older than those.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of Charles Mills <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 2:05 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Complex immediate operands External Message: Use Caution For the same reason that coders are still avoiding the "new" instructions like relative branches, LHI and grande instructions. /Charles/ +1-707-291-0908 On 3/30/2026 10:50 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > As useful as it is for other things, it doesn't help in this case. > > <kvetch>Why are people still giving assembler classes that don't cover LOCTR, > dependent USING and labelled USING?</kvetch> >
