Well, you don't need GOFF for your limited purpose. I'm pretty sure SECTALGN(16) works without it. If that's a problem, then you'll have to decide what option's least painful for you.
sas On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:04 PM Schmitt, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > I can say that I don't use GOFF because it requires LIST(133), which would > be OK except that we run the assembler listings through a program that adds > cross-reference statement numbers to the right side of the listing, which > increases the listing line size. LIST(121) listings are expanded to 133, > which is fine. But GOFF listings are expanded to LRECL=145, which no longer > fits in a mod 5 terminal. > > "Every change breaks someone's workflow" > >
