Inserting "ds 0f" in front solved the problem.
Thanks

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]>
> Em nome de Jonathan Scott
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 18 de agosto de 2022 10:50
> Para: [email protected]
> Assunto: Re: ASMA080E Statement is unresolvable
>
> The DS 0CL cannot be resolved in the first pass, because the
> length is a forward reference, and that creates a location
> counter break at that point, so the alignment after it is
> unknown and padding bytes might be needed at any point where a
> more aligned field follows a weaker alignment.
>
> (In this case, as the duplication factor is zero, a person can
> tell that this would not affect the location counter, but as the
> whole DC gets deferred as "unresolved" this causes a break.  We
> have investigated the possibility of an enhancement to allow a
> DC statement to be "partially resolved" to improve handling of
> similar cases, but this would be very difficult to implement.)
>
> This means that if the first field does not have the strongest
> alignment, the length cannot be resolved until the alignment
> before that field is known, but the DS 0CL cannot be resolved
> until the length is known, so the statement cannot be resolved.
>
> João writes:
> > 000020                            32923+FTOECLR  DS    0CL(FTOECLRL)
> > ** ASMA080E Statement is unresolvable
> ...
> > When I put FTOAASCB (a fullword) in the front, it works fine.
> >
> > When I put FTOMTLN (a halfword) in the front, is doesn’t work.
>
> Jonathan Scott, HLASM
> IBM Hursley, UK


--
O software antivírus Avast realizou uma checagem de vírus neste e-mail.
www.avast.com

Reply via email to