You didn't have a 129? Yes, I know what you could do on an 029 but not on a 129, and if coerced will admit to having done it.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]] on behalf of Charles Mills [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/OS HLASM: EQU for statement labels > TS is your friend My 029 didn't have a TS key. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/OS HLASM: EQU for statement labels The URL is 404 compliant. Has anybody put up a web site with copies of John's work and a few words of tribute? We owe him a lot. The best reason to put the label on the instruction is that you get correct TEST and ADATA output. If you have to insert a statement after the label, TS is your friend (I don't recall the XEDIT equivalent.) If you're using vi I don't want to know ;-)
