I never remember it been called anything other than the POP....
... e.g.

http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=360POP&ft=MEMO&args=pop#hit

but here both POP and POPs are used...

http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=3090&ft=MEMO&args=pops#hit


Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]>
> On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: 17 September 2019 19:12
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Poll
> 
> 'There are nine and sixty ways of constructing tribal lays,
>       And every single one of them is right!'
> 
> RK
> 
> 
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]>
> on behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Poll
> 
> Intresting, I’ve learned it’s called POP.
> 
> I teach assembler programming and now I have to think about telling the
> students that there are several different thoughts about which
abbreviation is
> the right one.
> 
> Olle Westergård,
> Core Systems
> SEB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 17 sep. 2019 kl. 05:02 skrev Mike Hochee <[email protected]>:
> >
> > POP, for many years, and I don't know why. I may lose sleep over this.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw
> > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 8:25 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Poll
> >
> > POPs
> >
> > Mike Shaw
> > MVS/QuickRef Support Group
> > Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:50 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Principles of Operation-how do you refer to it? (NOT including
> >> case-let's not make this any more complicated than it is already!)
> >>
> >> 1)     PofOp
> >>
> >> 2)     POP
> >>
> >> 3)     POO
> >>
> >> 4)     Pops
> >>
> >> 5)     other?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just curious-there are no wrong answers, of course! (Well, I suppose
> >> "IntelR 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer Manuals" is
> >> wrong.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> .phsiii
> >>
> >>
> >>

Reply via email to