Re LLIxx: thanks! Re PoPs: I didn't really mean to sound pedantic, it's just a curiosity of mine. In the official title, "Operation" is not plural (nor has it ever been as far as I can tell). Nevertheless, if everyone wants to call it PoPs, the fact that it isn't strictly logical doesn't matter much. English is like that.
sas On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:16 AM Jonathan Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > Ref: Your note of Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:05:32 -0400 > > Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sheesh. The z/OS 2.4 page still links to the -11 version of PoOp (I > don't > > understand what "PoPs" is supposed be abbreviating). > > I thought "POps" = "P of Ops" = "Principles of Operations" but > the case does seem to be very variable (even in my own notes). > > I've passed on the comment about the LLIxx instructions to the > editor. > > HLASM support for the z15 instructions is in the following PTFs > for APAR PH00902 which were sent to distribution on announcement > day, September 12th: > > z/VM: UI65289 > z/OS: UI65290 > z/VSE: UI65291 > > Jonathan Scott, HLASM > IBM Hursley, UK > -- sas
