U4096 is neither valid nor possible. U4095 is the maximum. The thing to watch out for is that it is possible to have both a user *and* a system abend code. This is rare, and may be a bad idea, but SDWACMPC and IEF450I allow for it.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:22 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > When interpreting the SDWACMPC, the system abend code (left half) is > traditionally interpreted in hexadecimal, while the user abend (right) half > is interpreted in decimal. > > One other thing to look for : U4096 is indistinguishable from S001 if you > just interpret this field. > > John > > > -- sas
