What is your initial using for r13? Is DLTABLE part of that dsect?
Just checked some code and
USING (X,X@END),R11
Seems to work (at least it does for dasm).
A dependent using (from the active usings hdr):
DBST(X'10994'),R11+X'32FC'
X dsect has
DBSTm DS XL(DBST$)
The using is:
USING DBST,DBSTm
...chris.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: December-20-16 10:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bogus ASMA307E?
Well, I found a work-around:
* USING DLTABD,DLTABLE This fails w/ASMA307E
USING DLTABD-4000,DLTABLE-4000 Trick to fool HLASM
My brain exploded trying to figure out the workarounds in the old postings.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well if that's the design, then the design is an ass. But I don't see
> how that's the case, as the manual says otherwise.
>
> I finally found Robert Ngan's nearly identical post from 2 years ago,
> and several older ones, too. There was one reference that implied IBM
> won't fix it because of "compatibility" issues. Frankly, that sounds
> like a cop-out; it would be more understandable to just say that it's
> not a high enough priority yet.
>
> And IBM hasn't bothered to update the manual either. Sheesh.
>
> Google was not my friend today. Apparently, the assembler-list
> archives aren't Googleable.
>
> Is there an outstanding SHARE req. for this?
>
> sas
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc- [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-12-20, at 09:13, Steve Smith wrote:
>>
>> > I'm getting an error on a dependent USING apparently just because
>> > it's
>> out
>> > of the normal 12-bit offset range...
>> >
>> > This seems to be a HLASM bug to me.
>> >
>> No. WAD. This has been discussed here before. (No, I don't like
>> it.)
>>
>> -- gil
>>
>
>
>
> --
> sas
>
--
sas
