This is all part and parcel of the implementation of the attitude that 'old = unacceptable'. Old stuff like manuals that allow users to know how to use assembler. 'New' stuff like Java is SO much more important since all the new young pups ONLY know Java and are too generally lazy to flex and bend and learn assembler(ok, they could flex and learn C since it's so similar to Java). But, I suspect that is extra impetus towards the managerial bad attitudes about documentation for assembler. Essentially they have it in their hearts to 'eventually' do away with using it, despite the fact that the mainframe has huge chunks written in it(or all?). THAT'S immaterial since THEY will do away with its use so that management can get people 'willing' to support the mainframe. -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 1/28/14, Automatic digest processor <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 27 Jan 2014 to 28 Jan 2014 (#2014-20) To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2014, 11:07 PM ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 27 Jan 2014 to 28 Jan 2014 (#2014-20) LISTSERV at the University of Georgia ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 27 Jan 2014 to 28 Jan 2014 (#2014-20) Table of contents: The Future of the ITSO The Future of the ITSO Re: The Future of the ITSO (01/28) From: Bob Raicer <[email protected]> Browse the ASSEMBLER-LIST online archives.
