On 2014-01-15 17:25, Ray Mullins wrote: > *sigh* > > All this talk about CP 037 and 1047. They're obsolete. > > The proper CPs to use today are 1140 and 924. Off the top of my head, > quite a few contributors to this can tell us why; my good friend Herr > Trübner is one who comes to mind immediately, although he might say that CP > 1141 should be used intead of 273, and our Hursley friends might vouch for > 1147 versus 285. > *sigh*
What can I do about Unix System Services, which relies on CP 1047? What can I do about HLASM, which relies on CP 037? Will IBM change them for me if I ask nicely enough? > I like 1148, personally, replacing 500. You see 500/1148 a lot in WMQ. > * sigh* Now you might be able to guess why I hate EBCDIC! (Did I miss some sarcasm? I hope so.) -- gil
