Only to provide the builder pattern to chain method executions, especially WRT setters.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Andy Clement <[email protected]>wrote: > Well with modifying the bytecode anything is possible. But whether it fits > into the remit of AspectJ I'm not sure. What is your use case? > > Andy > > > On 4 June 2013 09:10, Matthew Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can AspectJ replace void return types with 'return this' capability? >> Basically, for any class T, change >> void doStuff() {} >> to >> T doStuff() { return this; } >> >> This has been requested over in pure java land and got deferred. >> >> -Matthew >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > -- mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> skype:matthewadams12 googletalk:[email protected] http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
