Rick,
This is one of my personal pet peeves.  I started learning database and
Remedy around the same time, and all of the instruction that I ever
received in the database, and what makes most sense to me is

field = value

This translates in a remedy world to

'Field' = $Value$

So, from this convention, I always use it as you state you prefer.  Over
the years, I have found TONS of different contractors that come and go use

$Value$ = 'Field'

and while I don't believe it causes any performance impact in any way to do
it that way, it's visually unappealing to me...it took me awhile, but I
eventually figured out WHY some developers produce code that looks like
that.  It has to do how things show up in the drop down in the Dev Studio.
When building a setfield action, or push for that matter I think, when
selecting fields, 'Current Form' is always the 'default', and current form
is the one that produces $Value$, where 'form that it's being selected
from' is not the default....so, what you get is the developer selecting the
field on the current form first, and the 'other' form second, which builds a

$Value$ = 'Field'

type of qualification....so, while I don't think it causes any problems,
it's certainly not visually appealing to me...and I agree with you that it
'should be' the other way.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Rick Westbrock <[email protected]>
wrote:

> **
>
> Hi all-
>
>
>
> I wanted to get feedback on something I remember learning way back in a
> Remedy class (pre-BMC) in Pleasanton to make sure that I am remembering
> correctly. I seem to recall that I was told that the best practice when
> writing the qualification for a Set Fields action from another form that
> you should use the other form’s field before the operator and the current
> form’s field after the operator like this: 'DEPTID' = $DeptID-New$
>
>
>
> I thought that this was either more efficient or provided more predictable
> results (or maybe both). Does anyone else follow this convention? I have
> run across several instances in some custom workflow where that is reversed
> and I see $DeptID-New$ = 'DEPTID' which just feels wrong to me. Below is
> more detail to clarify my examples.
>
>
>
> Form A: field DeptID-New
>
> Form B: field DEPTID
>
>
>
> There is a filter on form A that does a set fields which reads its value
> from form B. I believe the proper syntax if I want to match the department
> ID fields between the forms is this:
>
> 'DEPTID' = $DeptID-New$
>
>
>
> From there the set fields action can copy values from the matching record
> in form B into the fields of form A.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> *_________________________*
>
>
> *Rick Westbrock *AppOps Engineer | IT Department
> 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
>
>
>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to