I tried sync cache last night and it seemed a bit faster but still took at
least 10-15 min.

I have noticed that after a sync I have issues logging back into mid-tier
which I assume means the sync is not done.  Is there a place to watch what
it's doing?

Different question:  Can you see who is logged on via the mid-tier as
opposed to client tool.  License review just shows everyone.

Different question:  Pop-up blockers.  A bit confusing, it says 'don't have
pop-ups active, then later it say it wants pop-ups.  I actually had misread
the 'don't allow' message wrong initially and had chosen 'always allow' and
didn't see any ill effects of that.

Thanks,
Susan


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Brittain, Mark <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>  Sync cache is disabled/grayed out so the only option I have is Flush
> Cache.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:13 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Another Mid-tier cache question
>
>  **
>
> Like LJ said its best left off on production as your changes to Production
> if your company follows a proper change process is minimal. And you Sync
> the cache whenever there is a genuine change in the cache.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ravi rai
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:07 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Another Mid-tier cache question
>
>
>
> LJ,
>
> We do Quarterly releases.After each release we do manual flush Cache .
>
> Is is safe to turn this option off.
>
> It might resolve cache corruption issues which we encounter almost every
> alternate week
>
>
>
> Ravi
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:57:48 -0600
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Another Mid-tier cache question
> To: [email protected]
>
> **
>
> Mark,
>
> I agree with Joe....but look at it this way....this check box tells the
> Mid-Tier server to periodically check your Remedy server for definition
> changes.  How often are definition changes made in your production
> server?....Weekly?  Monthly?  Quarterly?  You likely don't need an
> automated 'check' to be turned on in production as it doesn't change very
> often...and when it does, you can manually hit the 'sync' button.
>
>
>
> Regarding the app server being behind a load balancer...no, that won't
> affect things because regardless of which app node the mid-tier gets the
> cache from, it should be 'correct' :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Joe D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> **
>
> I won’t pretend to answer this question for you – but this is my guess..
>
>
>
> From what it looks like, this functionality performs a periodic check on
> the AR Server, to check for changes in definitions, and collects that
> information. This will in my opinion have some impact on performance.
>
>
>
> So as long as that interval is relatively high, and set in such a way that
> it occurs in periodic cycles when users are usually not online, it should
> be fine. My guess is that when this box is checked and the interval is
> defined, there is probably a definition check that happens that instant,
> followed next by the interval that is defined. So if this is done lets say
> at 11:00 PM when most users are usually offline in that time zone, and the
> interval is set for 86400 for the next check to happen at 11:00 PM the next
> night, you might not have too much to worry about.
>
>
>
> I would however not be comfortable doing it every few minutes, as it MAY
> impact the performance of that particular mid-tier server in that load
> balanced configuration..
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Joe
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brittain, Mark
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:34 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Another Mid-tier cache question
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Is it safe to use Definition Change Check (Peform Check) with load
> balancers? When the dev and production ITSM servers were installed Perform
> Check was no selected. Don't know why it was done that way.
>
>
>
> Later when I applied a patch to the mid-tier servers, BMC Support said I
> should select Perform Check. I did this on the development server which has
> one ar server, one mid-tier and no load balancers, but did
> not select Perform Check on production which is a VIP > load balanced to
> two mid-tiers which are load balanced to two ars servers in a server group.
>
>
>
> Particularly with small changes I really like using change check/perform
> check on dev and would like to use on the production servers. Since I don't
> know why this was not originally set up that way I figured I would ask the
> group first.
>
>
>
> ARS 7.6.06 SP3
>
> Mid-Tier 7.6.06 SP4
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>    _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> ------------------------------
> This e-mail is the property of NaviSite, Inc. It is intended only for the
> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that
> is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Distribution or copying of this e-mail, or the information contained
> herein, to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
>
> ------------------------------
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
> this E-mail and any printout.
>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to