HI David, Can you give us some more detail on what it means "when access rights to a newly-created field are not properly defined?" It is a bit bothersome to think 1) a lack of permissions can cause memory issues 2) that it is easy to not properly define a field which would cause memory issues.
Jason On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:42 PM, David M. Clark <[email protected]>wrote: > "We are getting this error intermittently over the past couple of weeks" > > Have you recently customized anything in that area? I've seen this happen > when access rights to a newly-created field are not properly defined. > > -D > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ARERR 300 Malloc failed on server > > Ken, > It sounds like your arserver was bouncing up against a upper memory limit. > This can happen sometimes with memory leaks that don't properly release > memory once used. A restart of the service brings the system back down to > initial minimums of startup. You may want to make sure that you are on the > most recent patch of 7.5 to ensure that any known issues are taken care of > properly. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Cecil, Ken > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: ARERR 300 Malloc failed on server > > ** > > We are getting this error intermittently over the past couple of weeks. > The most consistent time it is occurring is when trying to attach a largish > attachment (around 4MB). Some have also received it when trying to open an > attachment. Yesterday for awhile we were getting the error anytime the > SDA's were trying to attach any attachment to an Incident. I ended up > restarting the ar server service. > > > > Has anybody run across something similar? (Arerr 300 when working with > attachments) > > > > I have a support request in with BMC and waiting for a reply. The KB > articles I found did not seem to apply. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Ken Cecil > > 574-283-4248 > > [email protected] > > > > > > AR 7.5 > > ITSM 7.6 > > Windows 2003 Enterprise 64bit > > SQL 2008 > > > > > ________________________________ > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee. If you have received this email in error please > notify the system manager. Subject to local law, communications (including > traffic data) with Hubbell may be monitored by our systems [or a third > party's systems on our behalf] for the purposes of security and the > assessment of internal compliance with Hubbell policies. This footnote also > confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of > computer viruses. > www.hubbell.com <http://www.hubbell.com/> - Hubbell Incorporated > > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 > www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
