Have you applied any patches to ITSM 7.0.03 yet?  If you have not, doing so 
will uncover every pitfall of customization for you, especially patch 007 and 
earlier.  Try it on a snapshot of production (development or test server) and 
see what gets broken.

When I took my patch 006 system to 007 a couple of years ago, I had to build a 
long checklist of everything that had to be restored or re-customized while 
testing on development, then apply that checklist to production after applying 
the patch.  Patch 008 and 009 (applied together) were a little less damaging, 
but still required building a checklist on dev and executing it on production 
after the patch.  Some tricks helped, like applying the patch on dev, then 
migrating customized fields/forms back from production so that I wasn't 
overwriting any forms (which some of the patches DO).  Then I was able to 
migrate the custom objects back to production from dev after applying the patch 
on prod.  Make darn sure that you re-disable anything you disabled and copied 
to custom workflow; the patch may have re-enabled the original object, AND it 
may have made a change to it that you will need to add to your custom object!

Any attempt to upgrade from 7.0.0x to 7.5.01 or 7.6 will be much worse, as 
whole subsystems were rewritten and some of your integration 
points/customization interfaces will have changed underneath you.  We are 
making the jump to 7.6 from 7.0.03 a migration rather than an upgrade as a 
result, and we only made a limited number of customizations or integrations to 
Incident Management, People, and People Search.  Every customization you make 
to ITSM has the potential to cause difficulty when the next patch comes out, 
and is even more likely to hamper an upgrade.  That said, some customizations 
are essential to meet local requirements.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Coryat
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 1:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Customization Management Info

**
We are in our 3rd year of using Remedy, we have all the modules implemented 
from the ITSM suite and are finding the customers are wanting customizations 
partly due to our previous system was essentially a custom build.  Part of the 
reason we went to Remedy and ITSM was to get away from the support cost of 
having a custom environment.  Initially we developed our naming standards and 
development standards to follow to ensure consistency in the environment and 
follow the BMC standard for making customizations.  Now that we are a little 
more mature in the product we are wanting to ensure we are still on the right 
track with what we are doing.  If anyone could point to any whitepapers or be 
willing share experiences (good or bad) in the management of customizations we 
would be very interested and trying to glean more information.

Jim Coryat
Micron Technology Inc.
ITIL v2 Practitioner Certified


_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to